Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medical Tattooing for Capillary Malformations

• Published in: Dermatology (Basel) Vol. 239; no. 5; pp. 768 - 781
• Main Authors: Langbroek, Ginger Beau, Felsbourg, Julia, Wolkerstorfer, Albert, Horbach, Sophie E.R., Souisa Kooger, Loes, van Dieren, Susan, van Not, Olivier J., van Not, Hans P., Souisa, Rinus, Ubbink, Dirk T., van der Horst, Chantal M.A.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel, Switzerland 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Tattoo and Body Art – Research Article; Capillary malformations; Medical tattooing; Patient-reported outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Port-wine stains
• ISSN: 1018-8665; 1421-9832
• DOI: 10.1159/000530609

Background: Patients with capillary malformations (CMs) may undergo medical tattooing (MT) as an alternative to laser therapy. But little is known about treatment results and impact from the patients’ perspective. Objectives: In this cross-sectional digital survey study, we evaluated the patient-reported outcomes of MT for CMs. Methods: MT practices were identified via the Dutch Association of Skin Therapists and Google. These practices invited all their CM patients who had undergone MT between January 2011 and September 2021 to participate. Baseline and treatment characteristics, tattooing effectiveness, patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes, and complications were evaluated using a custom-made online survey. Quality of life was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Factors associated with treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction were identified via bivariate analysis and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results: Most of the 89 respondents were female (69%). Almost all CMs were located on the face (90%) and mainly (dark) red (74%). Nearly all patients had undergone laser therapy (91%). Median number of tattooing sessions was 5 (IQR: 4.0–8.0). Thirty-seven percent of the patients perceived >75% color reduction. Younger patients were more likely to obtain lower treatment effectiveness (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20–0.97). Most patients (83%) were satisfied with treatment results. Patients with lighter (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.72), non-facial (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.89), and hypertrophic CMs (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11–0.82) were less likely to be satisfied with treatment outcomes. Patients with lighter skin types were more satisfied (OR 2.89, 95% CI: 1.23–6.80). Complications included transient pain (23%), bleeding (3.4%), hypertrophic scarring (1.1%), hypopigmentation (1.1%), and a halo around the tattoo (1.1%). Conclusion: MT seems a valid alternative treatment in addition to laser therapy for CMs, with mild complications. Most patients are (very) satisfied with treatment results, while color reduction is incomplete. Hence, it seems appropriate to decide together with patients whether or not to use MT as primary treatment or secondary to laser therapy.