Ocular Deformations in Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

• Published in: Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 64; no. 3; p. 32
• Main Authors: Sibony, Patrick A, Laurie, Steven S, Ferguson, Connor R, Pardon, Laura P, Young, Millennia, Rohlf, F James, Macias, Brandon R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 01.03.2023
• Subjects: Eye Movements, Strabismus, Amblyopia and Neuro-Ophthalmology; Humans; Intracranial Hypertension - complications; Intracranial Pressure - physiology; Pseudotumor Cerebri - complications; Pseudotumor Cerebri - etiology; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Vision Disorders; Vision, Ocular
• ISSN: 1552-5783; 0146-0404; 1552-5783
• DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.3.32

Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) shares several clinical features with idiopathic intracranial-hypertension (IIH), namely disc edema, globe-flattening, hyperopia, and choroidal folds. Globe-flattening is caused by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in IIH, but the cause in SANS is uncertain. If increased ICP alone causes SANS, then the ocular deformations should be similar to IIH; if not, alternative mechanisms would be implicated. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT) axial images of the optic nerve head, we compared "pre to post" ocular deformations in 22 patients with IIH to 25 crewmembers with SANS. We used two metrics to assess ocular deformations: displacements of Bruch's membrane opening (BMO-displacements) and Geometric Morphometrics to analyze peripapillary shape changes of Bruch's membrane layer (BML-shape). We found a large disparity in the mean retinal nerve-fiber layer thickness between SANS (108 um; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 105-111 um) and IIH (300 um; 95% CI = 251-350.1 um). The pattern of BML-shape and BMO-displacements in SANS were significantly different from IIH (P < 0.0001). Deformations in IIH were large and preponderantly anterior, whereas the deformations in SANS were small and bidirectional. The degree of disc edema did not explain the differences in ocular deformations. This study showed substantial differences in the degree of disc edema and the pattern of ocular deformations between IIH and SANS. The precise cause for these differences is unknown but suggests that there may be fundamental differences in the underlying biomechanics of each consistent with the prevailing hypothesis that SANS is consequent to multiple factors beyond ICP alone. We propose a hypothetical model to explain the differences between IIH and SANS based on the pattern of indentation loads.