Time lapse photography with two different camera systems for in situ observation of the bivalve Diplodon chilensis (Gray, 1828) in a southern Chilean lake

• Published in: Gayana Vol. 83; no. 1; pp. 21 - 32
• Main Authors: Kohlberg, Gesche, Herbst, Anne, Niedzwiedz, Gerd, Woelfl, Stefan, Nimptsch, Jorge, Schories, Dirk
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Concepcion Universidad de Concepcion, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanograficas 01.06.2019; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción; Universidad de Concepción
• Subjects: Bivalvia; camera system comparison; Cameras; Comparative analysis; Cost analysis; Digital cameras; Diplodon chilensis; exhalant siphon area; Fauna; Filtration; Freshwater organisms; Image quality; Light sources; Low cost; Mollusks; Photography; Predators; Recording; time lapse photography; ZOOLOGY; Chile; exhalant siphon area; fotografía en lapso de tiempo; time lapse photography; camera system comparison; área de sifón exhalante; Diplodon chilensis; comparación de sistemas de cámaras
• ISSN: 0717-6538; 0717-652X; 0717-6538
• DOI: 10.4067/S0717-65382019000100021

We compared the validity of two low cost camera systems to analyze the filtration activity of Diplodon chilensis (Gray, 1828), the most common freshwater bivalve in southern Chile, by using time lapse photography. One camera system (Nikon D300) was connected with an external flash, whereas the other system (GoPro Hero 3+) contained a permanent video light source. Size change of the exhalant siphon area (ESA) of Diplodon individuals was used to track activity changes over time. The siphon of D. chilensis was completely closed for 3.4 % ± 5.2 % (mean ± SD) of the recording time and it shows a nearly completely opened siphon for 42.7 % ± 22.9 % of the recording time. The mean siphon opening was 68.3 % ± 26.5 % of its potential opening area. Although a red filter was placed in front of the video light source, the mobile fauna, especially Aegla abtao (Schmitt, 1942) and unidentified small fishes were highly attracted by the permanent light. We conclude that both low cost cameras are very suitable for in situ time lapse observation of freshwater clams since both deliver good image quality. However, special attention should be given to the light source since permanent light attracts animals including predators which might change filtration activity of D. chilensis.