The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Self-Compassion: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: Mindfulness Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 547 - 563
• Main Authors: Wong, Ming Yu Claudia, Chung, Pak-Kwong, Leung, Ka-Man
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.03.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Bibliographic data bases; Causality; Child and School Psychology; Citation management software; Cognitive Psychology; Coping; Exercise; Grey literature; Health services; Mental disorders; Mental health care; Meta-analysis; Participation; Pediatrics; Physical fitness; Psychology; Public Health; Review; Self compassion; Self esteem; Social Sciences; Systematic review; Taiwan; Regulated health-related behaviour; Self-compassion; Physical activity
• ISSN: 1868-8527; 1868-8535
• DOI: 10.1007/s12671-020-01513-4

Objectives According to the mental health service recommendations from WHO, self-care is the basis for tackling psychological concerns. Although self-esteem has been a symbolic self-driven psychological factor that could generate significant positive well-being and associated with physical activity (PA), self-esteem’s negative effects have been criticized by the advocation of self-compassion (SC). Therefore, with both PA and SC have been found to be effective in achieving positive psychological health, they are expected to show a relationship to cope with people’s mental health problems. Methods To fully study the relationship, a concrete systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to review the relationship between PA and SC. The meta-analysis outcome was obtained by the pooled correlation coefficient using the random effects model, and meta-regression with mixed-effect models were used to determine the moderate effects. Results A total of 25 studies, with n  = 5622 samples, were included. Ten studies examined the association between PA and SC; five studies examined the association between PA regulation and SC; and six RCT studies and four single group repeated measure studies examined the effect of PA on SC. The random effects model demonstrated a significant effect size on the overall relationship between PA and SC ( r  = 0.26), with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed the significant effect sizes on four types of relationship, with r  = 0.19, r  = 0.273 and r  = 0.34, r  = 0.273, respectively. All potential sources of heterogeneity, including age, gender, study design and risk of bias, showed no moderating effect on the relationship. Conclusion The relationship between PA and SC was significant while investigating the effect of non-mind-and-body interventions and constructing a mechanism of PA and SC can be done as future implications.