Blind dates: Exploring uncertainty in the radiocarbon evidence on the emergence of animal husbandry in the Dutch wetlands

•This is the first in-depth chronological study of the legacy datasets from the context of early animal husbandry in the Netherlands.•We scrutinise the established chronological narrative on the commencement of domestication in the Netherlands by means of Bayesian modelling and chronometric hygiene,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of archaeological science, reports Vol. 45; p. 103589
Main Authors Dreshaj, Merita, Dee, Michael, Peeters, Hans, Raemaekers, Daan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•This is the first in-depth chronological study of the legacy datasets from the context of early animal husbandry in the Netherlands.•We scrutinise the established chronological narrative on the commencement of domestication in the Netherlands by means of Bayesian modelling and chronometric hygiene, methods novel in Dutch archaeology.•We demonstrate that the chronostratigraphy of Hardinxveld-Giessendam de Bruin, Mesolithic site featuring the oldest remains of domesticated species and crucial to the debate on the start of Neolithisation in the Netherlands, is inconclusive and requires further research. Current results suggest that the context of the oldest domesticated animals is likely several centuries younger than previously thought. The emergence of animal husbandry in the Netherlands remains the subject of much speculation. Challenges in identifying domesticated animals among the faunal remains, inconsistent excavation documentation, and flawed radiocarbon analysis have resulted in questionable chronologies. This paper examines the available radiocarbon evidence from selected sites which are the mainstay of early examples of domesticated animals in the Netherlands, between 5000 and 4000 BCE.1All radiocarbon dates given in this paper, denoted as BCE, are calibrated unless stated otherwise.1 We approach the legacy data in two ways: by employing principles of chronometric hygiene to reassess the radiocarbon datasets of selected sites and by exploring the use of such data for future studies in chronology by means of Bayesian chronological modelling. The latter is demonstrated with a case study, whereby we employ legacy data from Hardinxveld-Giessendam De Bruin in Bayesian models to demonstrate that, despite their shortcomings, such dates remain a valuable resource for much needed future chronological analysis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2352-409X
DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103589