Laboratory decision-making during the classical swine fever epidemic of 1997–1998 in The Netherlands

• Published in: Preventive veterinary medicine Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 185 - 199
• Main Authors: de Smit, A.J., Eblé, P.L., de Kluijver, E.P., Bloemraad, M., Bouma, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.1999
• Subjects: Animals; antibodies; assays; blood; Border Disease - diagnosis; Border disease virus; Bovine viral diarrhea virus; Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease - diagnosis; Cattle; Classical Swine Fever - diagnosis; Classical Swine Fever - immunology; Classical swine fever virus; Classical swine fever virus - immunology; Classical swine fever virus - isolation & purification; Decision Making; detection; Diagnosis, Differential; diagnostic techniques; disease diagnosis; disease outbreaks; Disease Outbreaks - veterinary; disease prevalence; disease prevention; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary; fluorescent antibody technique; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct - veterinary; Laboratory diagnosis; Netherlands; neutralization tests; outbreaks; peroxidase; Samples; serodiagnosis; serological surveys; Swine; swine fever; symptoms; tonsils; Netherlands; Laboratory diagnosis; Samples; Classical swine fever virus
• ISSN: 0167-5877; 1873-1716
• DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00075-6

The National Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever (CSF) virus in the Netherlands examined more than two million samples for CSF virus or serum antibody during the CSF epizootic of 1997–1998. The immense amount of samples and the prevalence of border disease (BD) virus and bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) virus infections in Dutch pig herds necessitated the diagnostic efforts of the laboratory to be focused on generating CSF specific test results throughout the eradication campaign. Detection of 82% of the 429 outbreaks was achieved through the combined use of a direct immunofluorescence and peroxidase assay (FAT/IPA) with samples (tonsils) collected from clinically-suspected pigs. This suggests that in the majority of the outbreaks, the pigs had clinical signs that were recognised by the farmer and/or veterinarians, indicating the presence of CSF virus in a pig herd. A positive diagnosis of 74% of all the tissue samples (tonsils) collected at infected pig holdings was established by FAT. More than 140,000 heparinised blood samples were examined by virus isolation, resulting in the detection of 4.5% of the infected herds. CSF virus was isolated in approximately 29% of all the blood samples collected from pigs at infected or suspected farms. Several serological surveys — each done within a different framework — led to the detection of 13.5% of the total number of outbreaks. The detection of CSF virus antibody in serum was carried out by semi-automated blocking ELISA. Approximately 28.5% of the sera which reacted in the ELISA were classified as CSF virus-neutralising antibody positive and 26.5% as positive for other pestiviruses following the virus neutralisation test (VNT). We concluded that two of the CSF laboratory diagnostic methods described were determinative in the eradication campaign: first, the FAT for the screening of diseased pigs; and second, the ELISA and VNT when millions of predominantly healthy pigs needed to be screened for the presence of CSF serum antibody. Decision-making on the basis of results generated by either method can, however, be seriously hindered when samples are examined from pig herds with a high prevalence of non-CSF pestiviruses.