Agonists can discriminate between cloned human and mouse prostacyclin receptors

The ability of prostacyclin analogues to stimulate adenylyl cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PLC) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing cloned human (hIP) or cloned mouse (mIP) prostacyclin receptors has been compared. For hIP, the order of potency (pEC 50) for stimulating AC and PLC path...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProstaglandins, leukotrienes and essential fatty acids Vol. 70; no. 5; pp. 423 - 429
Main Authors Chow, K.B.S., Jones, R.L., Wise, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ability of prostacyclin analogues to stimulate adenylyl cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PLC) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing cloned human (hIP) or cloned mouse (mIP) prostacyclin receptors has been compared. For hIP, the order of potency (pEC 50) for stimulating AC and PLC pathways was similar: AFP-07 (9.3, 8.4)>cicaprost (8.3, 6.9), iloprost (7.9, 6.8)>taprostene (7.4, 6.8)>carbacyclin (6.9, 6.6), PGE 1 (6.6, 5.1). Although the standard IP agonists cicaprost and iloprost behaved similarly in both hIP and mIP receptor-expressing cells, carbacyclin and PGE 1 showed significantly higher potency at the mIP receptor, suggesting that the agonist recognition sites on hIP and mIP receptors are not identical. A further distinction between hIP and mIP receptors was found with taprostene, which had greater efficacy at hIP receptors (AC 94%, PLC 14%) than at mIP receptors (AC 77%, PLC 0%) (cicaprost=100% in each assay).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0952-3278
1532-2823
DOI:10.1016/j.plefa.2003.08.022