Quantification of cooking organic aerosol in the indoor environment using aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers

The Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) is used extensively to study the composition of non-refractory submicron aerosol composition during atmospheric field studies. During two recent studies of indoor environments, HOMEChem and ATHLETIC, the default ambient organic aerosol AMS quantification...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAerosol science and technology Vol. 55; no. 10; pp. 1099 - 1114
Main Authors Katz, Erin F., Guo, Hongyu, Campuzano-Jost, Pedro, Day, Douglas A., Brown, Wyatt L., Boedicker, Erin, Pothier, Matson, Lunderberg, David M., Patel, Sameer, Patel, Kanan, Hayes, Patrick L., Avery, Anita, Hildebrandt Ruiz, Lea, Goldstein, Allen H., Vance, Marina E., Farmer, Delphine K., Jimenez, Jose L., DeCarlo, Peter F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Taylor & Francis 03.10.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) is used extensively to study the composition of non-refractory submicron aerosol composition during atmospheric field studies. During two recent studies of indoor environments, HOMEChem and ATHLETIC, the default ambient organic aerosol AMS quantification parameters resulted in a large discrepancy with co-located instruments while sampling cooking organic aerosol (COA). Instruments agreed within uncertainty estimates during all other sampling periods. Assuming a collection efficiency (CE) of unity, adjustments to the AMS relative ionization efficiency (RIE) were required to reach agreement with co-located instruments. The range of RIE COA observed (ATHLETIC: RIE COA  = 4.26-4.96, HOMEChem: RIE COA  = 4.70-6.50) was consistent with RIE measured in the laboratory for cooking-specific molecules. These results agree with prior AMS studies which have indicated that more oxidized outdoor ambient organic aerosol has a relatively constant RIE of 1.4 ± 0.3 while more reduced organics have higher RIE. The applicability of a higher RIE was considered for two ambient datasets, and agreement between the AMS and co-located instruments improved when an increased response factor (RIE CE) was applied to positive matrix factorization-derived primary organic aerosol (POA). Based on the observations presented here and the literature, we recommend AMS users consider applying RIE COA =4.2 to source and indoor studies of COA and evaluate a higher POA response factor of the order of ∼1.5 in outdoor studies at urban background sites, and ∼2 at sites impacted by fresh sources. This study aims to improve AMS quantification methodology for reduced POA and highlights the importance of careful intercomparisons in field studies.
ISSN:0278-6826
1521-7388
DOI:10.1080/02786826.2021.1931013