Sealing effectiveness of a novel NHS-POx based patch: experiments in a dynamic ex vivo porcine lung
Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6-30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxaz...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of thoracic disease Vol. 15; no. 7; pp. 3580 - 3592 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
China
AME Publishing Company
31.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6-30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxazolines (NHS-POx) (GATT-Patch) to commercially available sealant products.
GATT-Patch Single/Double layers were compared to Progel
, Coseal
, Hemopatch
and TachoSil
in an
porcine lung model (first experiment). Based on these results, a second head-to-head comparison between GATT-Patch Single and Hemopatch
was performed. Air leakage (AL) was assessed in three settings using increasing ventilatory pressures (max =70 cmH
O): (I) baseline, (II) with 25 mm × 25 mm superficial pleural defect, and (III) after sealant application. Lungs floating on saline (37 ℃) were video recorded for visual AL assessment. Pressure and tidal volumes were collected from the ventilator, and bursting pressure (BP), AL and AL-reduction were determined.
Per sealant 10 measurements were performed (both experiments). In the first experiment, BP was superior for GATT-Patch Double (60±24 cmH
O) compared to TachoSil
(30±11 cmH
O, P<0.001), Hemopatch
(33±6 cmH
O, P=0.006), Coseal
(25±13 cmH
O, P=0.001) and Progel
(33±11 cmH
O, P=0.005). AL-reduction was superior for GATT-Patch Double (100%±1%) compared to Hemopatch
(46%±50%, P=0.010) and TachoSil
(31%±29%, P<0.001), and also for GATT-Patch Single (100%±14%, P=0.004) and Progel (89%±40%, P=0.027) compared to TachoSil
. In the second experiment, GATT-Patch Single was superior regarding BP (45±10
40±6 cmH
O, P=0.043) and AL-reduction (100%±11%
68%±40%, P=0.043) when compared to Hemopatch
.
The novel NHS-POx patch shows promise as a lung sealant, demonstrating elevated BP, good adhesive strength and a superior AL-reduction. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ORCID: 0000-0001-8586-063X. Contributions: (I) Conception and design: BP Hermans, WWL Li, EA Roozen, DIM van Dort, H van Goor, AFTM Verhagen; (II) Administrative support: BP Hermans, DIM van Dort; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: BP Hermans, DIM van Dort, EA Roozen; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: BP Hermans, DIM van Dort, EA Roozen, J Evers; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: BP Hermans, DIM van Dort, EA Roozen, WWL Li, H van Goor, AFTM Verhagen; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. |
ISSN: | 2072-1439 2077-6624 |
DOI: | 10.21037/jtd-22-1821 |