The concept of “interaction” in debates on human–machine interaction

The concept of “interaction” is central to debates on Human–machine interaction (HMI). At the same time, however, it is vague and ambiguous: “interaction” is understood in different ways within and between the scientific disciplines involved in debates on HMI. Ultimately, this makes it difficult to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHumanities & social sciences communications Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 551 - 13
Main Authors Schleidgen, Sebastian, Friedrich, Orsolya, Gerlek, Selin, Assadi, Galia, Seifert, Johanna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Palgrave Macmillan 01.12.2023
Springer Nature
Subjects
Artificial intelligence
Communication
Computers
Debates
Interdisciplinary aspects
Science
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The concept of “interaction” is central to debates on Human–machine interaction (HMI). At the same time, however, it is vague and ambiguous: “interaction” is understood in different ways within and between the scientific disciplines involved in debates on HMI. Ultimately, this makes it difficult to reasonably debate questions of ethics, politics, engineering, and the sciences regarding HMI. Against this background, we elaborate and analyze the different meanings and dimensions of the term “interaction” in the disciplines and discourses relevant to debates on modern HMI. For this purpose, we introduce a four-dimensional SMPC model, according to which “interaction” is specified with a view to its subjects, modes, purposes, and contexts. With this, we aim to provide a basis for a fruitful intra- and particularly inter disciplinary discourse on HMI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2662-9992
2662-9992
DOI:10.1057/s41599-023-02060-8