Fundamental safety strategy against severe accidents on prototype sodium-cooled fast reactor

The accident categories of severe accidents (SAs) for prototype sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) which need proper measures were investigated through the internal event probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and event tree analysis for the external event and six accident categories, unprotected loss of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nuclear science and technology Vol. 53; no. 11; pp. 1774 - 1786
Main Authors Onoda, Yuichi, Kurisaka, Kenichi, Sakai, Takaaki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Taylor & Francis 01.11.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The accident categories of severe accidents (SAs) for prototype sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) which need proper measures were investigated through the internal event probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and event tree analysis for the external event and six accident categories, unprotected loss of flow (ULOF), unprotected transient over power (UTOP), unprotected loss of heat sink (ULOHS), loss of reactor sodium level (LORL), protected loss of heat sink (PLOHS) and station blackout (SBO), were identified. Fundamental safety strategy against these accidents is studied and clearly stated considering the characteristics and existing accident measures of prototype SFR, and concrete measures based on this safety strategy are investigated and organized. The sufficiency of these SA measures is confirmed by comparing the evaluated core damage frequency (CDF) and containment failure frequency (CFF) to the target value, 1×10 −5 and 1×10 −6 per plant operating year, respectively, which were selected based on the IAEA's safety target. However, the target value of CDF and CFF should be satisfied considering all the SAs caused by both internal and external events. External event PRA for prototype SFR is now under evaluation and we set out to satisfy the target value of CDF and CFF considering both internal and external events.
ISSN:0022-3131
1881-1248
DOI:10.1080/00223131.2016.1159532