Perspectives on preparedness for pediatric emergencies after residency: A needs assessment

• Published in: AEM education and training Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. e10898 - n/a
• Main Authors: Delgado, Eva M., Fischer, Jason, Scott, Kevin R., Mamtani, Mira, Xiong, Ruiying, Tay, Khoon‐Yen, Verma, Archana, Franco, Marleny, Szydlowski, Ellen, Toto, Regina L., Conlon, Lauren, Posner, Jill C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Original Contribution
• ISSN: 2472-5390; 2472-5390
• DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10898

Background General emergency physicians provide most pediatric emergency care in the United States yet report more challenges managing emergencies in children than adults. Recommendations for standardized pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) curricula to address educational gaps due to variations in pediatric exposure during emergency medicine (EM) training lack learner input. This study surveyed senior EM residents and recent graduates about their perceived preparedness to manage pediatric emergencies to better inform PEM curricula design. Methods In 2021, senior EM residents and graduates from the classes of 2020 and 2019 across eight EM programs with PEM rotations at the same children's hospital were recruited and surveyed electronically to assess perceived preparedness for 42 pediatric emergencies and procedures by age: infants under 1 year, toddlers, and children over 4 years. Preparedness was reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with 1 or 2 defined as “unprepared.” A chi‐square test of independence compared the proportion of respondents unprepared to manage each condition across age groups, and a p‐value < 0.05 demonstrated significance. Results The response rate was 53% (129/242), with a higher response rate from senior residents (65%). Respondents reported feeling unprepared to manage more emergency conditions in infants compared to other age groups. Respondents felt least prepared to manage inborn errors of metabolism and congenital heart disease, with 45%–68% unprepared for these conditions across ages. A heat map compared senior residents to recent graduates. More graduates reported feeling unprepared for major trauma, impending respiratory failure, and pediatric advanced life support algorithms. Conclusions This study, describing the perspective of EM senior residents and recent graduates, offers unique insights into PEM curricular needs during EM training. Future PEM curricula should target infant complaints and conditions with lower preparedness scores across ages. Other centers training EM residents could use our findings and methods to bolster PEM curricula.