Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system?

Arguments related to forced distribution systems (FDS) are often dogmatic, but typically do not consider for whom such systems might be most and least appealing. We examine the relationships between participants' individual differences (cognitive ability, collectivism and core self‐evaluations)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman resource management journal Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 360 - 378
Main Authors Blume, Brian D., Rubin, Robert S., Baldwin, Timothy T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Arguments related to forced distribution systems (FDS) are often dogmatic, but typically do not consider for whom such systems might be most and least appealing. We examine the relationships between participants' individual differences (cognitive ability, collectivism and core self‐evaluations) and their attraction to an organisation utilising an FDS. From a sample of 143 advanced undergraduate students, we found that individuals were more likely to be attracted to an organisation using FDS when they possessed higher levels of cognitive ability and perceived FDS to be fairer. We also found a significant interaction between respondents' collectivism and fairness perceptions of FDS, indicating that individuals who are high in collectivism are particularly sensitive to perceptions of FDS fairness. Implications for organisational practice and future research are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:C292634E2635BEC98685091A499AFC30BB967F0B
ArticleID:HRMJ12016
ark:/67375/WNG-RSC036FF-0
ISSN:0954-5395
1748-8583
DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.12016