A non-parametric method for the comparison of partial areas under ROC curves and its application to large health care data sets

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a statistical tool for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Investigators often compare the validity of two tests based on the estimated areas under the respective ROC curves. However, the traditional way of comparing entire areas under tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 701 - 715
Main Authors Zhang, Dong D., Zhou, Xia-Hua, Freeman Jr, Daniel H., Freeman, Jean L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 15.03.2002
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a statistical tool for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Investigators often compare the validity of two tests based on the estimated areas under the respective ROC curves. However, the traditional way of comparing entire areas under two ROC curves is not sensitive when two ROC curves cross each other. Also, there are some cutpoints on the ROC curves that are not considered in practice because their corresponding sensitivities or specificities are unacceptable. For the purpose of comparing the partial area under the curve (AUC) within a specific range of specificity for two correlated ROC curves, a non‐parametric method based on Mann–Whitney U‐statistics has been developed. The estimation of AUC along with its estimated variance and covariance is simplified by a method of grouping the observations according to their cutpoint values. The method is used to evaluate alternative logistic regression models that predict whether a subject has incident breast cancer based on information in Medicare claims data. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-62KG5644-X
National Cancer Institute - No. CA72076
istex:746E22450A7EC5FD18109F6ED5A7839F4BA42F92
ArticleID:SIM1011
Department of Defense - No. DAMD17-97-1-709-5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.1011