Effects of matched vs. unmatched physical therapy interventions on pain or disability in patients with neck pain – a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Physiotherapy theory and practice Vol. 40; no. 12; pp. 3000 - 3019
• Main Authors: Mastromarchi, Paolo, McLean, Sionnadh, Ali, Nancy, May, Stephen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis Ltd 01.12.2024
• Subjects: Clinical assessment; Clinical trials; Disability; Disability Evaluation; Exercise therapy; Exercise Therapy - methods; Humans; Intervention; Manipulative therapy; Meta-analysis; Neck pain; Neck Pain - physiopathology; Neck Pain - therapy; Pain Measurement; Physical therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities; Physiotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Short term; Systematic review; Neck pain; assessment; clinical decision making; clinical reasoning; matched treatment
• ISSN: 0959-3985; 1532-5040; 1532-5040
• DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2285892

The interventions performed in most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on neck pain patients are standardized, irrespective of the high heterogeneity of patients. However, clinicians tend to choose an intervention based on the patients' clinical characteristics, and thus match the treatment to the patient. To investigate the effectiveness of interventions matched to the clinical characteristics of patients with neck pain versus the same, but unmatched treatment for improving pain or disability. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted following Cochrane guidelines. Databases searches were performed from inception to September 2023. RCTs were included if the patients in the experimental group received a treatment matched to clinical presentation or to clinicians' assessment, if the patients in the control group received a similar but unmatched treatment, and if pain or disability were reported as outcome measures. The literature search produced 9516 records of which 27 met the inclusion criteria. Matched exercise therapy was superior to unmatched exercise for pain (SMD -0.57; 95% CI -0.95, -0.18) and for disability (SMD -0.69; 95% CI -1.14, -0.23) at short term, but not at intermediate-term follow-up. Matched manual treatment was not superior to unmatched manual therapy for pain or for disability at short or intermediate-term follow-up. Results suggest that matching exercise to movement limitation, trapezius myalgia, or forward head position may lead to better outcomes in the short term, but not in the intermediate-term. Matched manual therapy was not superior to unmatched treatment either short or intermediate-term. Further research is warranted to verify if those criteria are potentially useful matching criteria.