Engagement in computerized cognitive training instructions by older people. A within-subject design to evaluate comprehension and acceptability of serious games instructions

This article emphasizes the advantages of using a within-subject experimental design to assess the impact of salient visual cues on the comprehension and acceptability of computerized cognitive training (CCT) instructions among older adults. The study would involve participants aged 65 and above, wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in aging Vol. 6; p. 1297704
Main Authors Nahas, Christelle, Gandit, Marc, Monfort, Emmanuel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers 03.02.2025
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article emphasizes the advantages of using a within-subject experimental design to assess the impact of salient visual cues on the comprehension and acceptability of computerized cognitive training (CCT) instructions among older adults. The study would involve participants aged 65 and above, who will engage in an online experiment presenting two sets of instructions for serious games: one with salient visual cues and one without. This within-subject design eliminates the need for random assignment, improves internal consistency, and enhances statistical power. Participants serve as their own controls, providing a more robust comparison of how visual cues affect instruction comprehension and software acceptance. The primary objective is to identify indicators of acceptability for CCT serious games and to evaluate how well participants comprehend the instructions, influencing their intention to use the software. The hypothesis suggests that salient visual cues will improve instruction comprehension and foster greater software acceptability. By focusing on this design method, the study aims to enhance the engagement of older adults in cognitive training programs, reducing dropout rates. This research offers valuable insights into methodological strengths that can be applied in future studies to improve the usability and acceptance of CCT tools for older adults without cognitive impairments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: John Alexander Waterworth, Umeå University, Sweden
Edited by: Laura Haynes, University of Connecticut, United States
Alessandro Oronzo Caffò, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
ISSN:2673-6217
1663-4365
2673-6217
1663-4365
DOI:10.3389/fragi.2025.1297704