Brain function rescue effect of lactate following hypoglycaemia is not an adaptation process in both normal and Type I diabetic subjects

We have previously shown that lactate protects brain function during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. An adaptation process could, however, not be excluded because the blood lactate increase preceded hypoglycaemia. We studied seven healthy volunteers and seven patients with Type I (insulin-dependent)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetologia Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 733 - 741
Main Authors MARAN, A, CREPALDI, C, TRUPIANI, S, LUCCA, T, JORI, E, MACDONALD, I. A, TIENGO, A, AVOGARO, A, DEL PRATO, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin Springer 01.06.2000
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We have previously shown that lactate protects brain function during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. An adaptation process could, however, not be excluded because the blood lactate increase preceded hypoglycaemia. We studied seven healthy volunteers and seven patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with a hyperinsulinaemic (1.5 mU.kg-1.min-1) stepwise hypoglycaemic clamp (4.8 to 3.6, 3.0 and 2.8 mmol/l) with and without Na-lactate infusion (30 mumol.kg-1.min-1) given after initiation of hypoglycaemic symptoms. The glucose threshold for epinephrine response was similar (control subjects 3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 3.2 +/- 0.1, diabetic patients = 3.5 +/- 0.1 vs 3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) in both studies. The magnitude of the response was, however, blunted by lactate infusion (AUC; control subjects 65 +/- 28 vs 314 +/- 55 nmol/l/180 min, zenith = 2.6 +/- 0.5 vs 4.8 +/- 0.7 nmol/l, p < 0.05; diabetic patients = 102 +/- 14 vs 205 +/- 40 nmol/l/180 min, zenith = 1.4 +/- 0.4 vs 3.2 +/- 0.3 nmol/l, p < 0.01). The glucose threshold for symptoms was also similar (C = autonomic 3.0 +/- 0.1 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1, neuroglycopenic = 2.8 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, D = autonomic 3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 3.2 +/- 0.1, neuroglycopenic 3.1 +/- 0.1 vs 3.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) but peak responses were significantly attenuated by lactate (score at 160 min C = 2.6 +/- 1 vs 8.8 +/- 1, and 0.4 +/- 0.4 vs 4.8 +/- 1, respectively; p = 0.02-0.01, D = 1.3 +/- 0.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.7, and 2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 p = 0.07-0.02). Cognitive function deteriorated in both studies at similar glucose thresholds (C = 3.1 +/- 0.1 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1, D = 3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 3.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). Although in normal subjects a much smaller impairment was observed with lactate infusion (delta four-choice reaction time at 160 min = 22 +/- 12 vs 77 +/- 31 ms; p = 0.02), in Type I diabetic patients lactate infusion was associated with an improvement in cognitive dysfunction (0.2 +/- 0.4 vs -38 +/- 0.2 delta ms, p = 0.0001). A blood lactate increase after the development of hypoglycaemic symptoms reduces counterregulatory and symptomatic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia and favours brain function rescue both in normal and diabetic subjects. These findings confirm that lactate is an alternative substrate to glucose for cerebral metabolism under hypoglycaemic conditions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0012-186X
1432-0428
DOI:10.1007/s001250051371