Assessment of the relative sensitivity of milk ELISA for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infectious dairy cows

• Published in: Journal of dairy science Vol. 100; no. 1; pp. 598 - 607
• Main Authors: Laurin, Emilie L., Sanchez, Javier, Chaffer, Marcelo, McKenna, Shawn L.B., Keefe, Greg P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2017
• Subjects: Animals; Cattle; Cattle Diseases - microbiology; diagnostic sensitivity; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary; Feces - microbiology; Female; Johne’s disease; Longitudinal Studies; Milk - microbiology; milk ELISA; Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis - immunology; Paratuberculosis - microbiology; season; milk ELISA; Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis; diagnostic sensitivity; season; Johne’s disease
• ISSN: 0022-0302; 1525-3198
• DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11194

Milk ELISA are commonly used for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) antibodies in dairy cows, due to low cost and quick processing for large numbers of samples. However, low sensitivity and variations from host and environmental factors can impede detection of MAP antibodies at early disease stages. The objectives of our study were to assess the sensitivity of milk ELISA in comparison with fecal tests and to evaluate how detectable antibody concentrations in milk vary with changes in fecal shedding of MAP, cow age, cow parity, days in milk, and time of year. To compare the sensitivity of a commercial milk ELISA with solid and broth fecal culture and with fecal real-time PCR, a longitudinal study was performed for the identification of MAP-infectious animals as determined by prior fecal testing for MAP shedding. In addition, associations between variation in milk MAP ELISA score and changes in fecal MAP shedding, host age, days in milk, and season were evaluated. Monthly milk and fecal samples were collected over 1 yr from 46 cows that were previously shedding MAP in their feces. Sensitivity of milk ELISA was 29.9% (95% CI: 24.8 to 35.1%), compared with 46.7% (40.7 to 52.7%) for fecal solid culture, 55.0% (49.3 to 60.7%) for fecal broth culture, and 78.4% (73.3 to 83.1%) for fecal direct real-time PCR. The effect of stage of lactation could not be separated from the effect of season, with increased milk ELISA scores at greater days in milk in winter. However, unpredictable monthly variations in results were observed among the 3 assays for individual cow testing, which highlights the importance of identifying patterns in pathogen and antibody detection over time in MAP-positive herds.