Prevalence and abundance of lactic acid bacteria in raw milk associated with forage types in dairy cow feeding

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) found in milk can be responsible for organoleptic defects in cheese. To identify sources of LAB that could potentially develop during cheese making, we evaluated their prevalence and abundance in milk according to the type of forage used in dairy cow feeding. Forages and b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of dairy science Vol. 103; no. 7; pp. 5931 - 5946
Main Authors Gagnon, Mérilie, Ouamba, Alexandre J.K., LaPointe, Gisèle, Chouinard, P. Yvan, Roy, Denis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) found in milk can be responsible for organoleptic defects in cheese. To identify sources of LAB that could potentially develop during cheese making, we evaluated their prevalence and abundance in milk according to the type of forage used in dairy cow feeding. Forages and bulk tank milk were sampled 3 times on 24 farms using either hay alone (control), or grass or legume silage supplemented with corn silage or not. Both types of silage were either non-inoculated or inoculated with commercial preparations containing at least a Lactobacillus buchneri strain along with Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium, or Pediococcus pentosaceus. Our results indicate that LAB viable counts in milk samples (2.56 log cfu/mL) did not differ according to the type of forage used. A total of 1,239 LAB were isolated and identified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Although inoculation increased lactobacilli abundance in grass silage by 35%, we did not observe an effect on the LAB profile of milk. Indeed, we found no significant difference in milk LAB prevalence and abundance according to the type of forage (P > 0.05). Moreover, isolates belonging to the L. buchneri group were rarely found in bulk tank milk (3 out of 481 isolates). Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing of 406 LAB isolates revealed the plausible transfer of some strains from silage to milk (~6%). Thus, forage is only a minor contributor to LAB contamination of milk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2019-17918