Evacuated glazing with tempered glass
•The U-values of double/triple evacuated glazing with tempered glass were simulated.•Compared with the U-values of double/triple vacuum glazing with annealed glass.•the U-value of double evacuated glazing with tempered glass is reduced by 47.4%.•the U-value of triple evacuated glazing with tempered...
Saved in:
Published in | Solar energy Vol. 183; pp. 240 - 247 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2019
Pergamon Press Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •The U-values of double/triple evacuated glazing with tempered glass were simulated.•Compared with the U-values of double/triple vacuum glazing with annealed glass.•the U-value of double evacuated glazing with tempered glass is reduced by 47.4%.•the U-value of triple evacuated glazing with tempered glass is reduced by 60.7%.•as tempered glass is 4 times stronger than annealed glass, less pillars are used.
The application of tempered glass has made it possible to significantly reduce the support pillar number within evacuated glazing (EG) since tempered glass (T-glass) is four to ten times mechanically stronger than annealed glass (A-glass). The thermal transmittance (U-value) of 0.4 m by 0.4 m double evacuated glazing (DEG) with 4 mm thick T-glass and A-glass panes with emittance of 0.03 were determined to be 0.3 Wm−2K−1 and 0.57 Wm−2K−1, respectively (47.4% improvement) using previously experimentally validated finite volume model. The thermal transmittance (U-value) of 0.4 m by 0.4 m triple evacuated glazing (TEG) with 4 mm thick T-glass and A-glass panes with emittance of 0.03 were determined to be 0.11 Wm−2K−1 and 0.28 Wm−2K−1, respectively (60.7% improvement). The improvement in the U-value of EG with T-glass is due to a reduction in support pillar number, leading to reduction in heat conduction through pillar array. The impact of tempered glass on the thermal transmittance for TEG is greater than that of DEG since radiative heat transfer in TEG is much lower than that in DEG, thus the reduction in heat conduction resulted from the reduction of support pillar number in TEG is much larger than that in DEG. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.021 |