The presentation of police in everyday life: Police–press relations, impression management and the Leveson Inquiry

In 2012 the Leveson Inquiry investigated relations between the police and the press, examining the routine systems and processes of police–press relations in the UK and, more specifically, the conduct of senior Metropolitan Police Service officers during an investigation into phone-hacking (Operatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrime, media, culture Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 239 - 257
Main Author Mawby, Rob C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.12.2014
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 2012 the Leveson Inquiry investigated relations between the police and the press, examining the routine systems and processes of police–press relations in the UK and, more specifically, the conduct of senior Metropolitan Police Service officers during an investigation into phone-hacking (Operation Caryatid). The Inquiry is notable in that it shone a light on a normally hidden policing function; it brought the backstage processes of police–media relations, part of police ‘image work’, to the frontstage area. This article considers the Leveson Inquiry and the data it collected as a case study of police impression management; it examines how the police sought to manage impressions about how they manage impressions. It takes a dramaturgical approach drawing on the work of Erving Goffman and Peter K Manning, combined with impression management concepts drawn from management and organisational studies. The article concludes that the identified impression management tactics used by different police ‘teams’ combined to protect the collective police image and to reinforce, for the present, the dominant position of the police in their relationship with the press.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1741-6590
1741-6604
DOI:10.1177/1741659014558433