Extraglottic device use is rare during emergency airway management: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study

• Published in: The American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 72; pp. 95 - 100
• Main Authors: April, Michael D., Driver, Brian, Schauer, Steven G., Carlson, Jestin N., Bridwell, Rachel E., Long, Brit, Stang, Jamie, Farah, Subrina, De Lorenzo, Robert A., Brown, Calvin A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2023; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Airway; Airway management; Algorithms; Compliance; Data collection; Difficult airway; Emergency department; Emergency medical care; Emergency preparedness; Extra-glottic device; Hypotension; Hypoxemia; Hypoxia; Intubation; Laryngeal mask airway; Oxygenation; Patients; Quality control; Respiratory tract; Secondary analysis; Statistical analysis; Success; Supra-glottic device; Ventilation; Ventilators; Emergency department; Extra-glottic device; Difficult airway; Laryngeal mask airway; Ventilation; Oxygenation; Airway; Supra-glottic device
• ISSN: 0735-6757; 1532-8171
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.07.024

Airway management is a critical component of the management of emergency department (ED) patients. The ED airway literature primarily focuses upon endotracheal intubation; relatively less is known about the ED use of extraglottic devices (EGDs). The goal of this study was to describe the frequency of use, success, and complications for EGDs among ED patients. The National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) is a prospective, multi-center, observational registry. It captures data on all ED patients at participating sites requiring airway management. Intubating clinicians entered all data into an online system as soon as practical after each encounter. We conducted a secondary analysis of these data for all ED encounters in which EGD placement occurred. We used descriptive statistics to characterize these encounters. Of 19,071 patients undergoing intubation attempts, 56 (0.3%) underwent EGD placement. Of 25 participating sites, 13 reported no cases undergoing EGD placement; the median number of EGDs placed per site was 2 (interquartile range 1–2.5, range 1–31). Twenty-nine (54%) patients had either hypotension or hypoxia prior to the start of airway management. Clinicians reported anticipation of a difficult airway in 55% and at least one difficult airway characteristic in 93% of these patients. Forty-one encounters entailed placement of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA®) Fastrach™, 33 of whom underwent subsequent successful intubation through the EGD and 7 of whom underwent intubation by alternative methods. An additional 10 encounters utilized a standard LMA® device. Providers placed 34 (61%) EGDs during the first intubation attempt. Seventeen EGD patients (30%) experienced peri-procedure adverse events, including 14 (25%) experiencing hypoxemia. None of these patients expired due to failed airways. EGD use was rare in this multi-center ED registry. EGD occurred predominantly in patients with difficult airway characteristics with favorable airway management outcomes. Clinicians should consider this emergency airway device for patients with a suspected difficult airway.