Prostate Cancer Support Groups A Literature Review

• Published in: Journal of psychosocial oncology Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 25 - 40
• Main Authors: Thaxton, Lyn, Emshoff, James G., Guessous, Omar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Taylor & Francis 01.01.2005; Haworth Press; Taylor & Francis LLC
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Biological and medical sciences; Cancer; expert speakers; Group psychotherapy; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Longevity; Male; Male genital diseases; Mammary gland diseases; Medical sciences; Patient Education as Topic; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology; psychoeducational; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling; Self Help Groups; Sick Role; Social Support; Support groups; Support Networks; Survivors - psychology; Treatments; Tumors; Human; Therapeutic process; Urinary system disease; Prostate disease; Treatment efficiency; Male; expert speakers; Malignant tumor; Review; Group psychotherapy; Psychoeducation; support groups; Quality of life; Selfcare; Treatment; psychoeducational; Male genital diseases; Prostate cancer; Comparative study; Social support
• ISSN: 0734-7332; 1540-7586
• DOI: 10.1300/J077v23n01_02

This article provides an overview of research literature related to cancer support groups, with particular reference to prostate cancer groups. Randomized studies of cancer support groups primarily focus on short-term psychoeducational and/or supportive/expressive groups for women with breast cancer. Many of these studies suggest that the interventions lead to a pronounced improvement in psychological functioning and may in some instances increase longevity. Regarding prostate cancer support-group members, information and education are especially valued. Open-ended, psychoeducational groups with large meetings, expert speakers, and structured, efficient organizations appear most beneficial to prostate cancer group members. The literature only partially answers a number of significant questions, including the types of groups most appropriate for people with specific diseases, process variables most significant to the success of groups, and specific factors that are barriers to group involvement by certain populations.