Critical review of standards for indoor thermal environment and air quality

• Published in: Energy and buildings Vol. 213; p. 109819
• Main Authors: Khovalyg, Dolaana, Kazanci, Ongun B., Halvorsen, Hanne, Gundlach, Ida, Bahnfleth, William P., Toftum, Jørn, Olesen, Bjarne W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Lausanne Elsevier B.V 15.04.2020; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Air quality; Air quality assessments; Air quality standards; Buildings; Demographics; Demography; Environmental assessment; Environmental conditions; Environmental factors; Environmental quality; Indoor air pollution; Indoor environments; International standards; Parameters; Quality; Thermal comfort; Thermal environments; Typology; Ventilation; ISO; PPD; IARC; DR; TVOC; HVAC; IEQ; PD; RH; IAQ; PMV; ISHRAE; ASHRAE
• ISSN: 0378-7788; 1872-6178
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109819

•ISO, EN, GB/T, and ISHRAE specify multiple categories for IEQ values, while ASHRAE, SS and AS provide acceptable levels.•Reviewed standards on IEQ focus on the perception rather than productivity and well-being.•There is no integrated assessment of various IEQ-related dimensions in the standards.•Occupants adaptation is considered to a greater extent in thermal comfort-relates standards.•Regional differences in climate, building typology, and demographics are not adequately covered in international standards. Quality of the indoor environment has become an important parameter to account for in new and existing buildings due to the increasing number of people spending most of their time indoors. Generally, the design and evaluation of indoor environments in buildings rely on appropriate guidelines and recommendations. National and international IEQ standards specify indoor environmental conditions considered acceptable to most occupants. This publication reviews and critically compares the requirements for indoor thermal environment and ventilation for acceptable air quality across international standards such as ISO, EN and ASHRAE and national standards of China, India, Singapore, and Australia. The critical analysis of IEQ standards demonstrates that regional differences and diversity factors due to factors such as climate, building typology, demographics, and culture might not be appropriately addressed both in national and international standards, limiting the feasibility of universal indoor environmental criteria. In addition to that, most of the standards provide recommendations for various categories of thermal comfort and air quality by focusing on the perception of IEQ by occupants rather than productivity and wellness as quantitative criteria. The review shows that thermal comfort and air quality parameters are treated separately and without an integrated assessment of various environmental quality-related dimensions. Therefore, there is a need for a method to combine various indoor environmental factors into a combined indicator.