Interinstitutional experience in verification of external photon dose calculations

Under the auspices of NCI contracts, four institutions have collaborated to assess the accuracy of the pixel-based dose calculation methods they employ for external photon treatment planning. The approach relied on comparing calculations using each group's algorithm with measurements in phantom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 37 - 58
Main Authors Masterson, Mary Ellen, Barest, Glenn, Chui, Chen-Shou, Doppke, Karen P., Epperson, Robert D., Harms, William B., Krippner, Kenneth E., Mohan, Radhe, Slessinger, Eric D., Sontag, Marc R., Urie, Marcia M., Wallace, Robert E., Wong, John W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.05.1991
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Under the auspices of NCI contracts, four institutions have collaborated to assess the accuracy of the pixel-based dose calculation methods they employ for external photon treatment planning. The approach relied on comparing calculations using each group's algorithm with measurements in phantoms of increasing complexity. The first set of measurements consisted of ionization chamber measurements in water phantoms in normally incident square fields, an elongated field, a wedged field, a blocked field, and an obliquely incident beam. The second group of measurements was carried out using thermoluminescent dosimeters in phantoms designed to investigate the effects of surface curvature, high density heterogeneities, and low density heterogeneities. The final study tested the entire treatment planning system, including CT data conversion, in an anthropomorphic phantom. Overall, good agreement between calculation and measurements was found for all algorithms. Regions in which discrepancies were observed are pointed out, areas for algorithm improvement are identified and the clinical import of algorithm accuracy is discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90166-2