Open versus arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study comparing two centres’ results using the Jaw Pain and Function Questionnaire

Surgical procedures currently used for treating of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint vary widely. Although different studies present favourable results following open or arthroscopic TMJ surgery, the criteria for a successful treatment outcome are not always defined identically. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 234 - 241
Main Authors Undt, Gerhard, Murakami, Ken-Ichiro, Rasse, Michael, Ewers, Rolf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2006
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Surgical procedures currently used for treating of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint vary widely. Although different studies present favourable results following open or arthroscopic TMJ surgery, the criteria for a successful treatment outcome are not always defined identically. In a retrospective study, two groups of patients who underwent either open or arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement (stages III–V according to Wilkes’ classification) were investigated using the so-called JPF-Questionnaire. The Kyoto collective (group 1) consisted of 28 patients, 2 men and 26 women, who underwent arthroscopic surgery. At the time of surgery, age ranged from 13 to 77 years (mean 32.8 y). The postoperative follow-up period ranged from 4 years and 4 months to 5 years and 9 months. Twelve of the 28 patients were classified as stage III, 10 as stage IV and 6 were classified as stage V (according to Wilkes) at the time of surgery. The Vienna collective (group 2) also consisted of 28 patients, 2 men and 26 women, who underwent open meniscoplasty or discectomy. At the time of surgery age ranged from 17 to 55 years (mean 31.6 years). The postoperative follow-up ranged from 5 to 6 years and 9 months. Fourteen of the 28 patients were classified as stage III, 11 as stage IV and 3 were classified as stage V (according to Wilkes) at the time of surgery. The results of the JPF-Questionnaire of the two groups were compared by Wilcoxon 2-sample tests. The Japanese version was applied, while in Austria the German version of this questionnaire was applied. At a level of significance α=0.05 no significant difference was found when comparing the subgroups (Wilkes stages III, IV and V) or both groups of patients 5 years after temporomandibular joint surgery. There cannot be any clear indication for only one of the treatment modalities as similar results were noted following open or arthroscopic temporomandibular joint surgery. Nevertheless, arthroscopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure resulting in a shorter or no time of hospitalization when compared with open surgery and therefore is preferred by many surgeons nowadays.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2005.12.002