Clinical Impact of [18F]FDG-PET in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer Based on Asymptomatically Elevated Tumor Marker Serum Levels: a Preliminary Report
Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) on the detection of recurrent breast cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor markers levels. Methods: Whole-body FDG-PET was performed in 30 patients with suspected recurrent b...
Saved in:
Published in | Japanese journal of clinical oncology Vol. 32; no. 7; pp. 244 - 247 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
01.07.2002
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) on the detection of recurrent breast cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor markers levels. Methods: Whole-body FDG-PET was performed in 30 patients with suspected recurrent breast cancer and asymptomatic tumor marker increase but negative or equivocal other imaging modality results. A blood sample was drawn in each case for marker assay (CA 15-3 and CEA) on the same day as the FDG-PET. All of these 30 asymptomatic patients had either CA l5-3 >32 U/ml or CEA >5 ng/ml. The final diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer was established by operation/biopsy histopathological findings or clinical follow-up for >1 year by additional morphological imaging techniques. Results: Among the 30 patients, the final diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer was established in 38 sites in 28 patients. FDG-PET accurately detected 35/38 sites in 25/28 patients with recurrence. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FDG-PET in patients with suspected recurrent breast cancer and asymptomatically elevated tumor markers were 96 and 90%, respectively. Conclusions: FDG-PET is a useful technique for detecting recurrent breast cancer suspected from asymptomatically elevated tumor markers levels and has an important clinical impact on the management of these patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Received February 12, 2002; accepted April 19, 2002 ark:/67375/HXZ-4FPGR31K-R istex:5E5072409FAAAFE7CBE7A4F281B959F2E7A49894 local:hyf052 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0368-2811 1465-3621 1465-3621 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jjco/hyf052 |