Flipped Inflammatory Time and the Role of Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: Optimizing Tocilizumab Against Coronavirus Disease 2019
Abstract Use of interleukin (IL-6) inhibitors has become one of the most complicated clinical issues in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recently, randomized open-label platform trials have found that IL-6 inhibitors have a beneficial effect on mortality in severe COVID-19. However, sev...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 226; no. 1; pp. 1 - 5 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
US
Oxford University Press
12.08.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Use of interleukin (IL-6) inhibitors has become one of the most complicated clinical issues in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recently, randomized open-label platform trials have found that IL-6 inhibitors have a beneficial effect on mortality in severe COVID-19. However, several questions arise around their mechanism of action in this disease, as well as how, when, and at which dose they should be used. IL-6 has both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects, which may modulate the course of COVID-19, whose immunopathogenesis is driven by the innate immune system, autoantibodies, and interferon. Given that patients with delayed seroconversion against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein would be at the highest risk of complications beyond the second week of disease, we propose that considering patient serostatus at admission could optimize the use of IL-6 inhibitors in COVID-19. We predict that the net treatment benefits could be higher in the subgroup of patients with delayed seroconversion as compared to those who seroconvert more rapidly after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We propose that treatment with interleukin 6 inhibitors in COVID-19 can be guided by the patient’s serostatus at hospital admission, becoming higher in the subgroup of patients with delayed seroconversion as compared to those who seroconvert more rapidly after SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-1899 1537-6613 |
DOI: | 10.1093/infdis/jiac090 |