Bridging Gender Divides: Toward a Transcendentalist Feminism

• Published in: Educational theory Vol. 72; no. 6; pp. 763 - 776
• Main Author: Saito, Naoko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.12.2022; Wiley; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: American literature; care ethics; Caring; Democracy; Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1803-1882); Ethics; feminine voice; Feminism; feminism of the father tongue; Fuller, Margaret; Gender Differences; gender divides; Humanism; Margaret Fuller; Politics; politics of recognition; Ralph Waldo Emerson; Realism; Recognition; Stanley Cavell; Transcendentalism; transcendentalist feminism
• ISSN: 0013-2004; 1741-5446
• DOI: 10.1111/edth.12559

How can we build a path from the binary of gender to the unity of common humanity? What kind of difference can the “different voice” of feminism make as a human voice? In this article, Naoko Saito argues that the way we talk about the difference of a “different voice” needs to be radically transformed. To envision a route to such a transformation, she explores an alternative possibility of feminism in the American transcendentalism of Margaret Fuller and Ralph Waldo Emerson. First, Saito critically examines the politics of recognition and suggests a susceptibility to binary thinking in its approach. Second, as a way of transcending the binary mode of thinking, Saito introduces the humanist feminism of the nineteenth‐century American transcendentalist Margaret Fuller. Third, as a way of elucidating the radicality of Fuller's transcendentalist feminism, Saito introduces the feminine voice of two male philosophers — Ralph Waldo Emerson and Stanley Cavell — as her conversational partners. By radically converting the way we talk about difference of voice, the transcendentalist feminism of Fuller, Emerson, and Cavell provides a third way that lies beyond the politics of recognition and care ethics. In conclusion, Saito proposes that the cultivation of the feminine subject requires an alternative political education that resists assimilation into political realism. This would realize our common humanity and, in its crossing of divides between men and women, would create democracy from within.