The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics

• Published in: The Angle orthodontist Vol. 82; no. 2; pp. 326 - 332
• Main Authors: Oz, A Alper, Arici, Nursel, Arici, Selim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Edward H Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc 01.03.2012
• Subjects: Adolescent; Cephalometry - methods; Child; Cuspid - pathology; Dental Alloys - chemistry; Dental Implants; Elastic Modulus; Female; Friction; Humans; Male; Mandible - pathology; Materials Testing; Maxilla - pathology; Molar - pathology; Nickel - chemistry; Original; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures - instrumentation; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Orthodontic Brackets - classification; Orthodontic Wires; Prospective Studies; Stainless Steel - chemistry; Titanium - chemistry; Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation; Torque
• ISSN: 0003-3219; 1945-7103
• DOI: 10.2319/032611-215.1

To compare the extent of canine movement with sliding mechanics between a self-ligating (SC) bracket and a modified twin design (MT) bracket. To test the in vitro coefficient of friction (COFs) of these two metal brackets on 0.019- × 0.025-inch, stainless-steel arch wires. For the clinical portion of this study, a split-mouth design was used to bond the brackets of 19 patients. Canine distalization was achieved on a 0.019- × 0.025-inch, stainless-steel arch wire with a nickel-titanium, closed-coil spring strained between a mini-screw and a canine bracket. The linear and angular measurements were performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before and after canine distalization. A tribometer was also used to measure the COFs of the bracket types in vitro. For comparisons, Student's t-tests for paired and unpaired samples were used at the 95% confidence level. The extent of canine movement and the changes in the canine and molar teeth angles were not significantly different between the SC and MT brackets. After 8 weeks, the mean canine movements were 1.83 and 1.89 mm in the maxilla and 1.79 mm and 1.70 mm in the mandible with the SC and MT brackets, respectively. The mean COF of the MT brackets (0.21) was significantly lower than that of the SC brackets (0.37) during in vitro testing. It is suggested that the rate of canine distalization was not different between the two groups, although in vitro COFs of the SC bracket was higher.