Behavior, Growth and Survival of Stage V Lobsters (Homarus Americanus) in Relation to Shelter Availability and Lobster Density
The effects of 2 levels of shelter availability (8 or 32 shelters) and of 3 levels of intraspecific density (5, 15, or 30 individuals per 0.5 m 2) on the behavior, survival and growth of stage V lobsters over a period of h 25 days were examined through controlled laboratory experiments. Dominance in...
Saved in:
Published in | Marine and freshwater behaviour and physiology Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 203 - 219 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Taylor & Francis Group
01.01.2002
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The effects of 2 levels of shelter availability (8 or 32 shelters) and of 3 levels of intraspecific density (5, 15, or 30 individuals per 0.5 m 2) on the behavior, survival and growth of stage V lobsters over a period of h 25 days were examined through controlled laboratory experiments. Dominance interactions were apparent in all treatments and only certain lobsters gained access to shelter in the medium- and high-density treatments. Lobsters spent more than 95% of their time in shelter when possible, and expressed significantly greater fidelity to one shelter in the 8-shelter treatment compared to the 32-shelter treatment. Shelter availability and lobster density had no effect on the incidence of molting or on the mean size of lobsters at experiment's end. The proportion of injured lobsters was independent of shelter availability, but was positively related to density. Lobsters were most likely to die after having molted and percent mortality was significantly greater at low density and in the 32-shelter treatment than in other treatments, probably due to a stronger and more consistent dominance hierarchy. Overall, the findings suggest that settlers may interact, that the frequency and intensity of interactions may be modified by relative shelter availability and lobster density, and that such interactions may contribute to determine a cohort's fate. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1023-6244 1029-0362 |
DOI: | 10.1080/1023624021000019324 |