A cutting plane method for solving harvest scheduling models with area restrictions

• Published in: European journal of operational research Vol. 228; no. 1; pp. 236 - 248
• Main Authors: Könnyű, Nóra, Tóth, Sándor F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.07.2013; Elsevier; Elsevier Sequoia S.A
• Subjects: Cutting planes; Decision making models; Forest management; Harvest; Integer programming; Mathematical problems; OR in natural resources; Scheduling; Scheduling algorithms; Spatially-explicit harvest scheduling; Studies; OR in natural resources; Integer programming; Spatially-explicit harvest scheduling; Cutting planes
• ISSN: 0377-2217; 1872-6860
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.020

► We present a novel cutting plane algorithm for spatial forest harvest scheduling. ► We test the computational performance of the method relative to existing models. ► We find the algorithm performs best when existing models fail. ► We discuss potential applications beyond forestry. We describe a cutting plane algorithm for an integer programming problem that arises in forest harvest scheduling. Spatial harvest scheduling models optimize the binary decisions of cutting or not cutting forest management units in different time period subject to logistical, economic and environmental restrictions. One of the most common constraints requires that the contiguous size of harvest openings (i.e., clear-cuts) cannot exceed an area threshold in any given time period or over a set of periods called green-up. These so-called adjacency or green-up constraints make the harvest scheduling problem combinatorial in nature and very hard to solve. Our proposed cutting plane algorithm starts with a model without area restrictions and adds constraints only if a violation occurs during optimization. Since violations are less likely if the threshold area is large, the number of constraints is kept to a minimum. The utility of the approach is illustrated by an application, where the landowner needs to assess the cost of forest certification that involves clear-cut size restrictions stricter than what is required by law. We run empirical tests and find that the new method performs best when existing models fail: when the number of units is high or the allowable clear-cut size is large relative to average unit size. Since this scenario is the norm rather than the exception in forestry, we suggest that timber industries would greatly benefit from the method. In conclusion, we describe a series of potential applications beyond forestry.