Yield and Its Components in Diploid, Tetraploid and Hexaploid Wheats in Diverse Environments

Fourteen diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Triticum accessions, including wild genotypes and primitive and modern cultivars, were examined in four diverse southern California environments for yield component differences. Biomass and grain yield per plant were highest for the hexaploid group followed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of botany Vol. 64; no. 6; pp. 635 - 642
Main Authors GUZY, M. R., EHDAIE, B., WAINES, J. G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Oxford University Press 01.12.1989
Academic Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fourteen diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Triticum accessions, including wild genotypes and primitive and modern cultivars, were examined in four diverse southern California environments for yield component differences. Biomass and grain yield per plant were highest for the hexaploid group followed by diploid and tetraploid groups. Spike number was highest in the diploid group, followed by the hexaploid and tetraploid groups. Earliness and stable harvest index account for the yield superiority of the hexaploids over the diploids and tetraploids, especially in the inland environments subject to terminal water and heat stress. For most characters, the coastal environment was more favourable than the inland, followed by the high altitude environment. Plasticity over environments for spike number and seeds per spike was greatest in diploid accessions, but plasticity in seed weight was greatest in wild tetraploid and primitive diploid cultivars. The wild and primitive diploid wheats exhibited high biomass accumulation and a high number of spikelets.
Bibliography:istex:B3C54D70EC8DA4CB5E192F069F478CBC6AE65CA4
ArticleID:64.6.635
ark:/67375/HXZ-377G4DRC-3
For correspondence.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-7364
1095-8290
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087888