Column studies on nitrate removal from potable water

• Published in: Water, air, and soil pollution Vol. 150; no. 1-4; pp. 235 - 254
• Main Authors: DARBI, A, VIRARAGHAVAN, T, BUTLER, R, CORKAL, D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer 01.11.2003; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Bacteria; Biological and medical sciences; Biological treatment of waters; Biotechnology; Dissolution; Dissolved oxygen; Drinking water; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination; Effluents; Environment and pollution; Environmental monitoring; Exact sciences and technology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Groundwater; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects; Limestone; Load distribution; Loading rate; Nitrate removal; Nitrates; Nitrogen; Nitrogen dioxide; Nitrogen removal; Nutrient removal; Oxidation-reduction potential; Pollution; Redox potential; Sulfur; Thiobacillus denitrificans; Water treatment and pollution; Drinking water treatment; column studies; Microbial activity; Metabolite; nitrate removal; Autotrophy; Nitrates; groundwater; Thiobacillus denitrificans; denitrilication; Operating conditions; Biological purification; limestone; Denitrification; Bacteria; sulfur; drinking water; Performance; Degradation product; autotrophic bacteria; Ground water
• ISSN: 0049-6979; 1573-2932
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1026149311106

Biological processes can achieve nitrate removal from groundwater. The sulfur/limestone autotrophic denitrification by Thiobacillus denitrificans was evaluated with three laboratory-scale column reactors. The optimum sulfur/limestone ratio was determined to be 2:1 (mass/mass). Different hydraulic retention times were used during the column tests to examine nitrate removal efficiencies. Under an HRTs of 13 h, nitrate concentration of 60 mgNO sub(3) super(-)-N L super(-1) was reduced to less than 5 mg NO sub(3) super(-)-N L super(-1). On a higher HRT of 26 h the nitrate removal efficiency was close to 100% for all nitrate-nitrogen loading rates. Different initial nitrate-nitrogen concentrations (30, 60, and 90 mg NO sub(3) super(-)-N L super(-1)) were used in the study. Column tests showed that the nitrate-nitrogen loading rate in this study was between 50 to 100 g NO sub(3) super(-)-N m super(-3) d super(-1) to obtain a removal efficiency of 80-100%. It was found that approximately 6 mg SO sub(4) super(2-) was produced for 1 mg NO sub(3) super(-)-N removed. Nitrite-nitrogen in all cases was less than the maximum allowable concentration of 1 mg NO sub(2) super(-)-N L super(-1). Effluent pH was stable in the range of 7 to 8; the effluent dissolved oxygen was less than 0.15 mg L super(-1) and the oxidation-reduction potential in all columns was in the range of -110 to -250 mV.