Successful acclimatization of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) translocated to Conkouati-Douli National Park, Republic of Congo, as measured by fecal glucocorticoid metabolites

• Published in: Conservation physiology Vol. 11; no. 1; p. coad025
• Main Authors: Woodruff, Miles C, Atencia, Rebeca, Cox, Debby, Woodruff, Glenn T, Wheaton, Catharine J, Lavin, Shana R, Setchell, Joanna M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.01.2023
• Subjects: pre-release enclosure; translocation; reintroduction; welfare; ethics; human-wildlife interactions
• ISSN: 2051-1434; 2051-1434
• DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coad025

Stress is implicated as a major cause of failure in wildlife translocations. We monitored the stress response non-invasively during a mandrill release. Our findings suggest a pre-release enclosure allowed mandrills to recover from transfer and the mandrills adjusted well to the forest, showing the value of non-invasive physiology in translocations. ABSTRACT Translocation and reintroduction are common tools in conservation management and can be very successful. However, translocation can be stressful for the animals involved, and stress is implicated as a major cause of failure in release programs. Conservation managers should therefore seek to understand how the stages of translocation impact stress physiology in the animals involved. We quantified fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCMs) as a noninvasive measure of response to potential stressors during a translocation of 15 mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) into Conkouati-Douli National Park, Republic of Congo. The mandrills were initially housed in a sanctuary, transferred to a pre-release enclosure in the National Park and then released into the forest. We collected repeated fecal samples (n = 1101) from known individuals and quantified fGCMs using a previously validated enzyme immunoassay. Transfer from the sanctuary to the pre-release enclosure correlated with a significant 1.93-fold increase in fGCMs, suggesting that transfer was a stressor for the mandrills. fGCM values decreased over time in the pre-release enclosure, suggesting that the mandrills recovered from the transfer and acclimatized to the enclosure. Release to the forest was not linked to a significant increase in fGCMs over the final values in the enclosure. Following release, fGCMs continued to decrease, fell below sanctuary values after just over a month and were about half the sanctuary values after 1 year. Overall, our results suggest that the translocation, although initially presenting a physiological challenge to the animals, was not detrimental to the well-being of the animals over the timescale of the study and, in fact, may have been beneficial. Our findings show the value of non-invasive physiology in monitoring, evaluating and designing wildlife translocations and, ultimately, contributing to their success.