Support structure constrained topology optimization for additive manufacturing

There is significant interest today in integrating additive manufacturing (AM) and topology optimization (TO). However, TO often leads to designs that are not AM friendly. For example, topologically optimized designs may require significant amount of support structures before they can be additively...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer aided design Vol. 81; pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors Mirzendehdel, Amir M., Suresh, Krishnan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2016
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is significant interest today in integrating additive manufacturing (AM) and topology optimization (TO). However, TO often leads to designs that are not AM friendly. For example, topologically optimized designs may require significant amount of support structures before they can be additively manufactured, resulting in increased fabrication and clean-up costs. In this paper, we propose a TO methodology that will lead to designs requiring significantly reduced support structures. Towards this end, the concept of ‘support structure topological sensitivity’ is introduced. This is combined with performance sensitivity to result in a TO framework that maximizes performance, subject to support structure constraints. The robustness and efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated through numerical experiments, and validated through fused deposition modeling, a popular AM process. •Addresses additive manufacturing support structure constraint in topology optimization.•Introduces topological sensitivity for support structures.•Combines support structure sensitivity with performance sensitivity.•Proposes a robust and efficient algorithm for support structure constrained topology optimization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0010-4485
1879-2685
DOI:10.1016/j.cad.2016.08.006