Predictors of severe pain during insertion of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system among nulligravid women
To identify sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with severe pain with levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) placement among nulligravid women. We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that evaluated intracervical anesthesia before IUS insertion. We assessed fac...
Saved in:
Published in | Contraception (Stoneham) Vol. 102; no. 4; pp. 267 - 269 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.10.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To identify sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with severe pain with levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) placement among nulligravid women.
We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that evaluated intracervical anesthesia before IUS insertion. We assessed factors associated with severe pain (visual analog scale pain score ≥7) immediately after insertion using bivariate and multiple regression analyses.
Overall, 137/300 (45.7%) subjects reported severe pain. In multiple regression analysis, only intracervical anesthesia [RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37–0.80] and a history of dysmenorrhea [RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72)] were associated with severe pain.
Among nulligravid women, a history of dysmenorrhea increases, and intracervical block decreases severe pain during levonorgestrel IUS insertion.
Dysmenorrhea increases the risk of severe pain at levonorgestrel intrauterine system insertion, while receiving an intracervical lidocaine block decreases this risk. This information can be useful for counseling women prior to device placement and for selecting candidates who may particularly benefit from interventions to reduce pain. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.07.004 |