Comparing Measures of Sparsity
Sparsity of representations of signals has been shown to be a key concept of fundamental importance in fields such as blind source separation, compression, sampling and signal analysis. The aim of this paper is to compare several commonly-used sparsity measures based on intuitive attributes. Intuiti...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on information theory Vol. 55; no. 10; pp. 4723 - 4741 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
IEEE
01.10.2009
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0018-9448 1557-9654 |
DOI | 10.1109/TIT.2009.2027527 |
Cover
Summary: | Sparsity of representations of signals has been shown to be a key concept of fundamental importance in fields such as blind source separation, compression, sampling and signal analysis. The aim of this paper is to compare several commonly-used sparsity measures based on intuitive attributes. Intuitively, a sparse representation is one in which a small number of coefficients contain a large proportion of the energy. In this paper, six properties are discussed: (Robin Hood, Scaling, Rising Tide, Cloning, Bill Gates, and Babies), each of which a sparsity measure should have. The main contributions of this paper are the proofs and the associated summary table which classify commonly-used sparsity measures based on whether or not they satisfy these six propositions. Only two of these measures satisfy all six: the pq-mean with p les 1, q > 1 and the Gini index. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0018-9448 1557-9654 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TIT.2009.2027527 |