Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life

• Published in: Nutrition in clinical practice Vol. 29; no. 6; p. 829
• Main Authors: Schwartz, Denise Baird, Barrocas, Albert, Wesley, John R, Kliger, Gustavo, Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro, Márquez, Humberto Arenas, James, Rosemarie Lembo, Monturo, Cheryl, Lysen, Lucinda K, DiTucci, Angela
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2014
• Subjects: Algorithms; Attitude of Health Personnel; Checklist; Consensus; Contraindications; Decision Making; Dementia - physiopathology; Dietetics - manpower; Dietetics - standards; Enteral Nutrition - standards; Evidence-Based Medicine; Family; Gastrostomy; Humans; Patient-Centered Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Societies, Scientific; Terminal Care - standards; United States; enteral nutrition; aged; dementia; nutritional support; terminal care; ethics
• ISSN: 1941-2452
• DOI: 10.1177/0884533614546890

Based on current scientific literature, gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement or other long-term enteral access devices should be withheld in patients with advanced dementia or other near end-of-life conditions. In many instances healthcare providers are not optimally equipped to implement this recommendation at the bedside. Autonomy of the patient or surrogate decision maker should be respected, as should the patient's cultural, religious, social, and emotional value system. Clinical practice needs to address risks, burdens, benefits, and expected short-term and long-term outcomes in order to clarify practice changes. This paper recommends a change in clinical practice and care strategy based on the results of a thorough literature review and provides tools for healthcare clinicians, particularly in the hospital setting, including an algorithm for decision making and a checklist to use prior to the placement of G-tubes or other long-term enteral access devices. Integrating concepts of patient-centered care, shared decision making, health literacy, and the teach-back method of education enhances the desired outcome of ethical dilemma prevention. The goal is advance care planning and a timely consensus among health team members, family members, and significant others regarding end-of-life care for patients who do not have an advance directive and lack the capacity to advocate for themselves. Achieving this goal requires interdisciplinary collaboration and proactive planning within a supportive healthcare institution environment.