Vaccine clinical trials with dynamic borrowing of historical controls: Two retrospective studies

Traditional vaccine efficacy trials usually use fixed designs with fairly large sample sizes. Recruiting a large number of subjects requires longer time and higher costs. Furthermore, vaccine developers are more than ever facing the need to accelerate vaccine development to fulfill the public's...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmaceutical statistics : the journal of the pharmaceutical industry Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 475 - 491
Main Authors Callegaro, Andrea, Karkada, Naveen, Aris, Emmanuel, Zahaf, Toufik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2023
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1539-1604
1539-1612
1539-1612
DOI10.1002/pst.2283

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Traditional vaccine efficacy trials usually use fixed designs with fairly large sample sizes. Recruiting a large number of subjects requires longer time and higher costs. Furthermore, vaccine developers are more than ever facing the need to accelerate vaccine development to fulfill the public's medical needs. A possible approach to accelerate development is to use the method of dynamic borrowing of historical controls in clinical trials. In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility and the performance of this approach in vaccine development by retrospectively analyzing two real vaccine studies: a relatively small immunological trial (typical early phase study) and a large vaccine efficacy trial (typical Phase 3 study) assessing prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccine. Results are promising, particularly for early development immunological studies, where the adaptive design is feasible, and control of type I error is less relevant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1539-1604
1539-1612
1539-1612
DOI:10.1002/pst.2283