Comparing internal representations of facial expression kinematics between autistic and non‐autistic adults

Recent developments suggest that autistic individuals require dynamic angry expressions to have a higher speed in order for them to be successfully identified. Therefore, it is plausible that autistic individuals do not have a ‘deficit’ in angry expression recognition, but rather their internal repr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAutism research Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 493 - 506
Main Authors Keating, Connor T., Sowden, Sophie, Cook, Jennifer L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent developments suggest that autistic individuals require dynamic angry expressions to have a higher speed in order for them to be successfully identified. Therefore, it is plausible that autistic individuals do not have a ‘deficit’ in angry expression recognition, but rather their internal representation of these expressions is characterised by very high‐speed movement. In this study, matched groups of autistic and non‐autistic adults completed a novel emotion‐based task which employed dynamic displays of happy, angry and sad point light facial (PLF) expressions. On each trial, participants moved a slider to manipulate the speed of a PLF stimulus until it moved at a speed that, in their ‘mind's eye’, was typical of happy, angry or sad expressions. Participants were shown three different types of PLFs—those showing the full‐face, only the eye region, and only the mouth region, wherein the latter two were included to test whether differences in facial information sampling underpinned any dissimilarities in speed attributions. Across both groups, participants attributed the highest speeds to angry, then happy, then sad, facial motion. Participants increased the speed of angry and happy expressions by 41% and 27% respectively and decreased the speed of sad expressions by 18%. This suggests that participants have ‘caricatured’ internal representations of emotion, wherein emotion‐related kinematic cues are over‐emphasised. There were no differences between autistic and non‐autistic individuals in the speeds attributed to full‐face and partial‐face angry, happy and sad expressions respectively. Consequently, we find no evidence that autistic adults possess atypically fast internal representations of anger. Lay Summary This study shows that autistic and non‐autistic individuals do not differ in the speeds they assign to angry, happy and sad facial expressions. This is important because it means that we know that autistic and non‐autistic individuals picture angry, happy and sad expressions in a similar way in terms of speed. Therefore, autistic individuals' difficulties recognising ‘normal speed’ angry expressions are not due to differences in the speeds they expect the expressions to be.
Bibliography:Funding information
H2020 European Research Council (ERC‐2017‐STG), Grant/Award Number: 757583; Medical Research Council, Grant/Award Number: MR/R015813/1
ISSN:1939-3792
1939-3806
DOI:10.1002/aur.2642