Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer patients: results of the PACS 01 economic study

Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of oncology Vol. 21; no. 7; pp. 1448 - 1454
Main Authors Marino, P., Siani, C., Roché, H., Protière, C., Fumoleau, P., Spielmann, M., Martin, A.-L., Viens, P., Le Corroller Soriano, A.-G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2010
Oxford University Press
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome. To deal with uncertainty due to sampling fluctuations, confidence regions around the ICERs were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were drawn up. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to assess the robustness of conclusions. The mean cost of treatment was 33% higher with strategy FEC-D, but this difference decreased to 18% at a 5-year horizon. The ICER of FEC-D versus FEC100 was estimated to be 9665€ per QALY gained (95% confidence interval €2372–€55515). The estimated probability that FEC-D was cost-effective reached >96% for a threshold of €50000 per QALY gained. If the price of taxane decreased slightly, the ICER would reach some very reasonable levels and this strategy would therefore be much more cost-effective. The sequential use of FEC100 followed by docetaxel appears to be a cost-effective alternative, even when uncertainty is taken into account.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-BBLDFQKJ-N
istex:9D95EE2ED39A9DEB76745EAD513B4F6C9B17C41C
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdp561