Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer patients: results of the PACS 01 economic study
Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effective...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of oncology Vol. 21; no. 7; pp. 1448 - 1454 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.07.2010
Oxford University Press Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer.
Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome. To deal with uncertainty due to sampling fluctuations, confidence regions around the ICERs were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were drawn up. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to assess the robustness of conclusions.
The mean cost of treatment was 33% higher with strategy FEC-D, but this difference decreased to 18% at a 5-year horizon. The ICER of FEC-D versus FEC100 was estimated to be 9665€ per QALY gained (95% confidence interval €2372–€55515). The estimated probability that FEC-D was cost-effective reached >96% for a threshold of €50000 per QALY gained. If the price of taxane decreased slightly, the ICER would reach some very reasonable levels and this strategy would therefore be much more cost-effective.
The sequential use of FEC100 followed by docetaxel appears to be a cost-effective alternative, even when uncertainty is taken into account. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/HXZ-BBLDFQKJ-N istex:9D95EE2ED39A9DEB76745EAD513B4F6C9B17C41C |
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdp561 |