Vertical Relationships with Hidden Interactions

In an agency model with adverse selection, we study how hidden interactions between agents affect the optimal contract. The principal employs two agents who learn their task environments through their involvement. The principal cannot observe the task environments. It is important to note that hidde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGames Vol. 14; no. 6; p. 69
Main Authors Kim, Jaesoo, Shin, Dongsoo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2023
Subjects
agency
Business competition
collusion
Competition
Cooperation
Economic incentives
Efficiency
help
Literature reviews
Moral hazard
Organizational structure
Sabotage
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In an agency model with adverse selection, we study how hidden interactions between agents affect the optimal contract. The principal employs two agents who learn their task environments through their involvement. The principal cannot observe the task environments. It is important to note that hidden interactions, such as acts of sabotage or help between the agents, have the potential to alter each other’s task environments. Our analysis encompasses two distinct organizational structures: competition and cooperation. Without hidden interactions, the competitive structure is optimal because the cooperative structure only provides the agents with more flexibility to collusively misrepresent their task environments. With hidden interactions, however, the cooperative structure induces the agents to help each other to improve the task environments while removing sabotaging incentives at no cost once collusion is deterred. As a result, the cooperative structure can be optimal in such a case. We discuss the link between production technology and organizational structure, finding that complementarity in production favors cooperative structures.
ISSN:2073-4336
2073-4336
DOI:10.3390/g14060069