Effect of zeolite A coating thickness on adsorption kinetics for heat pump applications

• Published in: Microporous and mesoporous materials Vol. 193; pp. 115 - 121
• Main Authors: Tatlier, Melkon, Munz, Gunther, Fueldner, Gerrit, Henninger, Stefan K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 15.07.2014; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adsorption kinetics; Chemistry; Coating; Colloidal state and disperse state; Exact sciences and technology; General and physical chemistry; Ion-exchange; Porous materials; Surface physical chemistry; Thickness; Zeolite; Zeolites: preparations and properties; Thickness; Adsorption kinetics; Zeolite; Coating; Adsorption; Heat pump; Kinetics; Porous material
• ISSN: 1387-1811; 1873-3093
• DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.017

[Display omitted] •Zeolite A coatings with rough surfaces are prepared by substrate heating.•Adsorption rates of the coatings having various thicknesses are determined.•Optimum zeolite A coating thickness, maximizing the power, exists.•Optimum thickness, around 130–140μm, varies somewhat with normalized loading. Zeolite A coatings of various thicknesses were directly crystallized on stainless steel plates by using the substrate heating method. The coatings prepared were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), laser microscopy and thermogravimetry (TG). Kinetic measurements were performed to determine the rates of adsorption of these materials, which exhibited rough corrugated surfaces with accessible nature. It was observed that the overall adsorption kinetics slowed down to some extent with the increasing thickness of the coatings. Regarding the power estimated for their use in adsorption heat pumps, the higher mass of the thicker samples could compensate for this limiting effect up to some point. An optimum zeolite A coating thickness, maximizing the power, was determined to exist between 58μm and 176μm, representing the thinnest and thickest coatings investigated in this study. For the operating conditions used, the optimum thickness value was around 130–140μm, which varied to some extent with the amount of normalized loading.