A novel 2D-3D conversion method for calculating maximum strain of geosynthetic reinforcement in pile-supported embankments
For design of a geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankment over soft soil, the methods used to calculate strains in geosynthetic reinforcement at a vertical stress were mostly developed based on a plane-strain or two-dimensional (2-D) condition or a strip between two pile caps. These 2...
Saved in:
Published in | Geotextiles and geomembranes Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 336 - 351 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Essex
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2019
Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | For design of a geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankment over soft soil, the methods used to calculate strains in geosynthetic reinforcement at a vertical stress were mostly developed based on a plane-strain or two-dimensional (2-D) condition or a strip between two pile caps. These 2-D-based methods cannot accurately predict the strain of geosynthetic reinforcement under a three-dimensional (3-D) condition. In this paper, a series of numerical models were established to compare the maximum strains and vertical deflections (also called sags) of geosynthetic reinforcement under the 2-D and 3-D conditions, considering the following influence factors: soil support, cap shape and pattern, and a cushion layer between cap and reinforcement. The numerical results show that the maximum strain in the geosynthetic reinforcement decreased with an increase of the modulus of subgrade reaction. The 2-D model underestimated the maximum strain and sag in the geosynthetic reinforcement as compared with the 3-D model. The cap shape and pattern had significant influences on the maximum strains in the geosynthetic reinforcements. An empirical method involving the geometric factors of cap shape and pattern, and the soil support was developed to convert the calculated strains of geosynthetic reinforcement in piled embankments under the 2-D condition to those under the 3-D condition and verified through a comparison with the results in the literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-1144 1879-3584 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.011 |