The effect of the homeopathic remedies Arnica montana and Bellis perennis on mild postpartum bleeding—A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study—Preliminary results

To evaluate the effect of Arnica Montana and Bellis perennis on postpartum blood loss. Double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial. Department of Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem. Forty parturients were randomized to one of three groups: Arnica montana C6 and Belli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComplementary therapies in medicine Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 87 - 90
Main Authors Oberbaum, Menachem, Galoyan, Narine, Lerner-Geva, Liat, Singer, Shepherd Roee, Grisaru, Sorina, Shashar, David, Samueloff, Arnon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2005
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the effect of Arnica Montana and Bellis perennis on postpartum blood loss. Double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial. Department of Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem. Forty parturients were randomized to one of three groups: Arnica montana C6 and Bellis perennis C6 ( n = 14), Arnica montana C30 and Bellis perennis C30 ( n = 14), or double placebo ( n = 12). After 48 h the Arnica/placebo was halted, and patients continued the Bellis/placebo until cessation of lochia. Hemoglobin levels (Hb) at 48 and 72 h postpartum. At 72 h postpartum, mean Hb levels remained similar after treatment with homeopathic remedies (12.7 versus 12.4) as compared to a significant decrease in Hb levels in the placebo group (12.7 versus 11.6; p < 0.05), in spite of less favorable initial characteristics of the treatment group. The mean difference in Hb levels at 72 h postpartum was −0.29 (95% CI −1.09; 0.52) in the treatment group and −1.18 (95% CI −1.82; −0.54) in the placebo group ( p < 0.05). Treatment with homeopathic Arnica montana and Bellis perennis may reduce postpartum blood loss, as compared with placebo.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0965-2299
1873-6963
DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.03.006