Optimization of MR Signal Contrast of the Lumbar Cartilaginous Endplates Using Ultra-Short TE

The ultra-short TE (UTE) technique has been recently used to investigate lumbar cartilaginous endplates (CEPs). However, parameters of UTE have not been investigated, especially optimal second TE is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of an optimal second TE with UTE for visual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied magnetic resonance Vol. 50; no. 1-3; pp. 381 - 389
Main Authors Takashima, Hiroyuki, Yanagida, Mika, Imamura, Rui, Yoshimoto, Mitsunori, Ogon, Izaya, Nakanishi, Mitsuhiro, Akatsuka, Yoshihiro, Okuaki, Tomoyuki, Yoneyama, Masami, Hatakenaka, Masamitsu, Yamashita, Toshihiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Vienna Springer Vienna 01.03.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ultra-short TE (UTE) technique has been recently used to investigate lumbar cartilaginous endplates (CEPs). However, parameters of UTE have not been investigated, especially optimal second TE is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of an optimal second TE with UTE for visualizing CEPs. The subjects included 20 volunteers without LBP who did not undergo lumbar spine surgery. A UTE sequence with fat suppression was used, and TEs were set at 0.16 ms as first TE, and 4.6, 9.2, 13.8, 18.2 ms as second TE. Analyzed images subtracted each second TE image from first TE image. Two researchers measured contrast ratio (CR) between CEPs and vertebral bodies (VBs), intervertebral discs (IVDs). ICCs between two researchers were calculated for CRs ( r  = 0.924, 0.939). CR between CEP and VB of 13.8 and 18.4 ms was significantly higher than that of other TEs ( p  < 0.01). CR between CEP and IVD of 9.2 and 13.8 ms was significantly higher than that of other TEs ( p  < 0.01, 0.05). CEPs were evaluated using subtraction images obtained with UTE. The first TE was 0.16 ms, the optimal second TE was suggested to be 13.8 ms for evaluating human CEPs.
ISSN:0937-9347
1613-7507
DOI:10.1007/s00723-018-1100-4