Fluorouracil Bolus Use in Infusional Regimens Among Oncologists—A Survey by Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumors

PURPOSE The utility of administering fluorouracil (5-FU) in bolus in regimens of infusional 5-FU has been questioned. We aimed to quantify the use of 5-FU bolus in infusional regimens for gastrointestinal malignancies among Brazilian oncologists. METHODS This was a cross-sectional electronic survey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJCO global oncology Vol. 7; no. 7; pp. 1270 - 1275
Main Authors Peixoto, Renata D., Coutinho, Anelisa K., Weschenfelder, Rui Fernando, Prolla, Gabriel, Rocha, Duilio, Andrade, Aline Chaves, Rego, Juliana Florinda, Fernandes, Gustavo dos Santos, Crosara, Marcela, Hoff, Paulo Marcelo, Dienstmann, Rodrigo, Costa e Silva, Matheus, Riechelmann, Rachel P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wolters Kluwer Health 01.12.2021
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PURPOSE The utility of administering fluorouracil (5-FU) in bolus in regimens of infusional 5-FU has been questioned. We aimed to quantify the use of 5-FU bolus in infusional regimens for gastrointestinal malignancies among Brazilian oncologists. METHODS This was a cross-sectional electronic survey composed of eight multiple-choice questions sent to Brazilian oncologists during 14 days in February 2021. The survey instrument collected demographic data of participants and assessed practices in terms of 5-FU bolus use. We evaluated the association of demographic variables and 5-FU prescribing patterns with Fisher’s exact test (odds ratio [OR]). RESULTS The survey was completed by 332 medical oncologists. Overall, 37% were experienced oncologists and 32% were gastrointestinal specialists. In the first-line metastatic and in the adjuvant settings, 40% and 67% of oncologists always prescribe 5-FU bolus in infusional regimens, respectively. Experienced oncologists more frequently omit 5-FU bolus when compared with early-career oncologists, both in the metastatic (41% v 26%; OR, 1.98; P = .005) and adjuvant settings (28% v 14%; OR, 2.32; P = .003). In addition, more GI specialists remove 5-FU bolus when compared with generalists, but only in the metastatic setting (44% v 25%; OR, 2.33; P = .001). GI specialists are more likely to consider that treatment efficacy is not affected by 5-FU bolus withdrawal than are generalists (89% v 75%; OR, 2.65; P = .003). Most respondents (67%) keep leucovorin at the same doses when omitting 5-FU bolus, and only 16% always recommend dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase testing. CONCLUSION Our survey indicates that experience in oncology practice and percentage of time dedicated to treat GI cancers influence the prescription of 5-FU bolus in Brazil, with more frequent omission of it among experienced gastrointestinal specialists, particularly in the metastatic setting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2687-8941
2687-8941
DOI:10.1200/GO.21.00167