Transient interface temperature on a vertical surface in multi-component solid–liquid systems with volume heating. Application to various severe accident situations

•The approach aims to improve multi-phase and multi-component thermal-hydraulics.•Same interface relation applies for ceramic dissolution, MCCI and IVR.•Interface temperature depends on fluid and wall properties and on ablation rate.•We predict ablation instabilities when the melt interacts with two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNuclear engineering and design Vol. 278; pp. 199 - 208
Main Authors Seiler, J.M., Combeau, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.10.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The approach aims to improve multi-phase and multi-component thermal-hydraulics.•Same interface relation applies for ceramic dissolution, MCCI and IVR.•Interface temperature depends on fluid and wall properties and on ablation rate.•We predict ablation instabilities when the melt interacts with two walls. The question of the transient interface conditions in various severe accident situations, involving multi-component and multi-phase material mixtures has until now remained largely unresolved. The interface temperature controls melt temperature and transient heat-flux distribution. The present paper proposes a new approach to the transient interface temperature, drawing on the numerous past efforts. A single relation is proposed which applies to various severe accident situations: (i) thermal-hydraulic steady state for in-vessel retention (IVR); (ii) transient solidification; (iii) transient concrete ablation (MCCI); and (iv) refractory material (ceramic) ablation (core-catcher retention, liner design). This approach yields the following important conclusions:-When a thermal-hydraulic steady state can be reached (external cooling, in case of IVR and melt stabilization in an externally cooled core-catcher), the melt-solid interface temperature tends towards the liquidus temperature corresponding to the melt composition.-During the ablation transient:•the interface temperature is lower than the melt liquidus temperature if the wall-melting temperature is less than the melt liquidus temperature (MCCI),•the interface temperature is higher than the melt liquidus temperature if the melting temperature of the wall exceeds the melt liquidus (oxidic corium-refractory ceramic interaction). The new interface model also suggests that simultaneous ablation of two similar walls (for instance: two concrete walls) may be subject to instabilities which can potentially result in complete arrest of the ablation of one of the walls. In the case of simultaneous ablation of two walls of different nature, the wall with the lowest melting temperature is preferentially ablated during the transient phase.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0029-5493
1872-759X
DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.008