CFD wind tunnel investigation for wind loading on angle members in lattice tower structures

• Published in: Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics Vol. 236; p. 105397
• Main Authors: Hadane, A., Redford, J.A., Gueguin, M., Hafid, F., Ghidaglia, J.-M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2023; Elsevier
• Subjects: Angle members; CFD; Engineering Sciences; Lattice towers; Turbulent flow; Wind loading; CFD; Wind loading; Angle members; Turbulent flow; Lattice towers
• ISSN: 0167-6105; 1872-8197
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105397

Wind loading on lattice structures is studied locally by considering the applied forces on individual angle members. This work represents a comprehensive Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis of wind loading on angle members, which includes a quantitative evaluation of the aerodynamic drag and lift loading and also a qualitative investigation of the wake characteristics behind the angle member. The focus is on the flow around the angle member cross-section which has two equal length sides at a right angle to each other. CFD has been used to investigate the flow around a single angle member characterized by its length D, thickness T, and angle of incidence to the oncoming flow. Both Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) are evaluated for a Reynolds number of 37,700, where the k-ϵ RANS and Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-viscosity (WALE) LES models are respectively used. The results are compared with the wind tunnel experiments reported in the literature (Wardlaw, 1967; Slater, 1969; Prud’homme et al., 2014) and the National Building Code of Canada (Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes and National Building Code of Canada, 2005), where the drag and lift coefficients at a range of incidence angles were reported. Quantitatively, the RANS performs well when compared to experiments for the aerodynamic coefficients at a range of incidence angles and less well for angles where a cavity style flow is formed and the separation becomes influential. This is in contrast to other bluff body cases where RANS does not perform so well. The LES is thus run at selected incidence angles for comparison and to better understand the flow where the RANS performs well and less well. Details of the turbulence in the wake are difficult to interpret when using RANS modeling, but this behavior is well illustrated with the LES model and details are reported here. •Evaluation of the aerodynamic drag and lift loading on angle members.•Investigation of the wake characteristics behind the angle member.•Both RANS and LES are evaluated for a Reynolds number of 37,700.•RANS performs well againt litterature at a range of incidence angles.•LES better understand the flow where the RANS performs less well.•This study constitutes a basis for evaluating the mask effect over multiple members.